In an effort to encourage research on understanding and improving FOSS (Free, Open Source Software), MSR has established the “FOSS Impact paper” award. The award will be granted to papers that show outstanding contributions to the FOSS community. For many years, the MSR community has leveraged public data from FOSS projects, and in the process, the community has contributed new insights, tools, and techniques to assist FOSS projects in different ways. This award recognizes and encourages this line of research. Authors can self-nominate their research papers for the FOSS award, after which the dedicated committee will evaluate these papers.
Any paper that is notified as accepted in the MSR Technical Track (including all categories: Research Papers, Practice Experience, and Tool Track) can self-nominate for the FOSS Award. Those papers will be examined by the FOSS Award Committee, that will select awarded papers based on the impact of the paper (or the study, experience or tool described in it) on the FOSS (free, open source software) development community. To self-nominate, authors will submit their paper (the same version that was reviewed but with no double-blind provisions) to the FOSS Award track in EasyChair. When convenient, links to source code, reproducible packages, etc. related to the paper should appear in the paper, so that the FOSS Award Committee can inspect them. When submitting their paper, authors will be requested to fill in a form, where they will explain the rationale for self-nominating the paper. This rationale should be written in terms of the impact of the paper on the FOSS development community: how it could benefit, or are already benefiting, from its results, the use of the tools described, the reported experience, etc.
The awarded papers will be announced during MSR. They could be one or more papers, but the Award could also be declared void.
Mon 29 Jun Times are displayed in time zone: (UTC) Coordinated Universal Time change
11:00 - 12:00: Build, CI, & DependenciesTechnical Papers / Registered Reports / Keynote / MSR Awards / FOSS Award / Education / Data Showcase / Mining Challenge / MSR Challenge Proposals / Ask Me Anything at MSR:Zoom
Chair(s): Raula Gaikovina KulaNAIST
Q/A & Discussion of Session Papers over Zoom (Joining info available on Slack)
|11:00 - 11:12|
|A Tale of Docker Build Failures: A Preliminary StudyMSR - Technical Paper|
Yiwen WuNational University of Defense Technology, Yang ZhangNational University of Defense Technology, China, Tao WangNational University of Defense Technology, Huaimin WangPre-print Media Attached
|11:12 - 11:24|
|Using Others' Tests to Avoid Breaking UpdatesMSR - Technical Paper|
Suhaib MujahidConcordia University, Rabe AbdalkareemConcordia University, Montreal, Canada, Emad ShihabConcordia University, Shane McIntoshMcGill UniversityPre-print Media Attached
|11:24 - 11:36|
|A Dataset of DockerfilesMSR - Data Showcase|
A: Jordan HenkelUniversity of Wisconsin–Madison, A: Christian Bird, A: Shuvendu LahiriMicrosoft Research, A: Thomas RepsUniversity of Wisconsin-Madison, USAMedia Attached
|11:36 - 11:48|
|Empirical Study of Restarted and Flaky Builds on Travis CIMSR - Technical Paper|
Thomas DurieuxKTH Royal Institute of Technology, Sweden, Claire Le GouesCarnegie Mellon University, Michael HiltonCarnegie Mellon University, USA, Rui AbreuInstituto Superior Técnico, U. Lisboa & INESC-IDDOI Pre-print Media Attached
|11:48 - 12:00|
|LogChunks: A Data Set for Build Log AnalysisMSR - Data Showcase|
A: Carolin BrandtDelft University of Technology, A: Annibale PanichellaDelft University of Technology, A: Andy ZaidmanTU Delft, A: Moritz BellerFacebook, USAPre-print Media Attached
Tue 30 Jun Times are displayed in time zone: (UTC) Coordinated Universal Time change
2020 Award Recipients
James Walden: The Impact of a Major Security Event on an Open Source Project: The Case of OpenSSL
Award for its analysis on the impact of the Heartbleed vulnerability on the OpenSSL project, providing recommendations for how open source projects can adapt and improve. The author provides guidance regarding metrics that helps to assess the health of a project. This paper is a piece of literature that interesting and relevant to many FOSS maintainers.